Translate

Friday, November 28, 2025

Lessons from the Wilderness Volume 69_Part Nine of What We Know

 

Go to Part One Go to part Two Go to Part Three Go to Part Four Go to Part Five 

Go to Part 6 Go to part 7 Go to Part 8

©2011-2025, David E. Robinson: At the Gates of Yerushalayim Ministries

Lessons from the Wilderness, Volume 69

…What We Know… Part Nine

“You Worship What You Do Not Know”[i] [ii] [iii]

…A Biblical Examination of the Jewish Context of our Blessed Hope in Messiah…


 19 The woman said to him, “Sir, I perceive that pyou are qa prophet. 20 rOur fathers worshiped on sthis mountain, but you say that tin Jerusalem is uthe place where people ought to worship.” 21 Jesus said to her, vWoman, believe me, wthe hour is coming when xneither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father.

22 yYou worship what you do not know; zwe worship what we know, for zsalvation is afrom the Jews.

But bthe hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father cin spirit and dtruth, for the Father eis seeking such people to worship him. 24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.”[iv]


     We now come to the end of this matter, the end of our series. The last few parts have been veering toward the Technical for a reason. That reason is as simple as it is profound:

Bible reading is not bible study.

                There is a cognitive connection to reading and studying. We have to think about what we are reading. We just simply cannot accept rote learning as a way to get to know YHVH in the manner He wants us to know Him – a deep abiding knowledge that comes with asking questions, with searching for the answers, with what the Holy and inspired words of God and man have laid down to create a living document that changes lives, changes destinies. We have to know Him within the framework and context in which he chose to introduce Himself and ultimately, His Messiah Yeshua.

Our worldview has to be the same as those who wrote the words, their cultures, their mistakes, their successes, the way they understood the world to be. The Bible, in both its forms, is not a science book. It is not a book on astrology, it is not a philosophical treatise: it was not written to scholars, pastors, professors, or even laymen and women of the “church”. It was not written to Americans, Russians, Englanders, or any “religion”, be it Christian (in all its denominational flavors), Islam, Buddhism, Secular Humanism, Hinduism, or the “isms” of any nation save one.

It is a Jewish Book, both iterations (Tanakh and Messianic), through and through.

It was written exclusively TO them, the ancient Israelites,

But also, it was written FOR us, those that followed, so that we too, as strangers and sojourners, could find the only True ʾelōhiym and be saved.

Study is the highest form of worship there is: embrace it and learn of Him.



Let us recap the lessons from the last two parts:

In a Jewish theological frame, knowledge of God (daʿat ʾelōhiym) is not merely a intellectual assent but relational fidelity (i.e. a relationship based on loyalty) within covenant. To “know” God means to walk in His ways (Deut 10:12–13), to live inside the pattern of relationship He defines. We are to walk in Covenantal participation which therefore means that one’s knowledge of God is enacted—you participate in His revealed will rather than merely affirming it. It is a shared life, not an abstract belief.

In a Jewish biblical sense, epistemic accountability is the religious obligation to seek, acquire, and use knowledge (specifically the knowledge of God and His commandments) to inform one's actions and then live an ethical, covenantal life. It links the intellectual pursuit of "knowing" with the moral requirement of "doing," making one responsible to God and the community for the knowledge one gains and how it is applied. 

When consider together then – what becomes the next logical step in knowing God? This is the final piece of the puzzle we have all been searching for.




Knowing God as Covenant Fidelity: A Scriptural Trajectory

         We will look at this final trajectory from my viewpoint and that of several scholars who have helped to shape my own way of reading When Scripture speaks of “knowing God,” it presents something far richer than intellectual assent or theological sharpness. Knowledge of God (daʿat ʾelōhiym) is covenantal, relational, and morally binding; it draws a person into the life God shapes, and the character God reveals. Across the canon, a consistent trajectory emerges: those who know God are those whose lives are re-ordered by His revelation—who love as He commands, pursue justice as He embodies it, return to Him in loyal faithfulness, worship Him according to His self-disclosure, and persevere in what Dr. Michael S. Heiser calls “believing loyalty”.[v] Deuteronomy, Jeremiah, Hosea, and the Gospel of John together provide a unified picture of what true knowledge of God demands.

Deuteronomy 6 lays the foundation.

Now this is zthe commandment—the statutes and the rules1—that the Lord your God commanded me to teach you, that you may do them in the land to which you are going over, to possess it, that ayou may fear the Lord your God, you and your son and your son’s son, by keeping all his statutes and his commandments, which I command you, all the days of your life, and bthat your days may be long. Hear therefore, O Israel, and be careful to do them, that it may go well with you, and that you may multiply greatly, cas the Lord, the God of your fathers, has promised you, in a land flowing with milk and honey.

“Hear, O Israel: dThe Lord our God, the Lord is one.2 You eshall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And fthese words that I command you today shall be on your heart. gYou shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. hYou shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. iYou shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates. ([vi]) ([vii])


        

      Israel’s knowledge of God begins with the Shema, the call to “hear”—that is, to hear in order to obey. To love the LORD with heart, soul, and strength is to internalize His words so deeply that they reshape one’s life from within. Heiser observes that “biblical faith was never mere intellectual agreement; it was covenant commitment expressed in obedience.”[viii]

Knowledge is thus the seed of loving obedience. In this context, believing loyalty becomes the heart of covenant knowing faith is expressed not through abstract belief but through embodied allegiance to Yahweh’s covenant. Jeremiah extends this trajectory by linking knowledge of God with ethical imitation. Speaking of King Josiah, Jeremiah declares, “He defended the cause of the poor and needy… Is not this to know Me?” (Jer 22:16).

Knowledge becomes visible in justice and righteousness—actions that mirror God’s own character. Heiser again notes that this seamless union of faith and justice is essential: “To image God is to imitate God’s character in the world; loyalty to Yahweh is displayed through righteous action.” [ix]

Josiah’s faithfulness is not doctrinal precision alone, but allegiance expressed through just governance. This is believing loyalty in ethical form. Hosea reveals what happens when this covenantal knowledge and believing loyalty collapse. In Hosea 4, the absence of the “knowledge of God” leads to societal decay—not because the people lack information, but because they refuse to live the truth they possess.

kHear the word of the Lord, O children of Israel, for lthe Lord has a controversy with the inhabitants of the land.

                         There is no faithfulness or steadfast love,and mno knowledge of God in the land;

            nthere is swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break all bounds, and obloodshed follows bloodshed.

             Therefore pthe land mourns, and all who dwell in it languish, qand also the beasts of the field

and the birds of the heavens, rand even the fish of the sea are taken away.

            sYet let no one contend, and let none accuse, for with you is tmy contention, O priest.1

            You shall stumble by day; the prophet also shall stumble with you by night; and I will destroy uyour mother.

            My people are destroyed vfor lack of knowledge; wbecause you have rejected knowledge,

I reject you xfrom being a priest to me. And since you have forgotten the law of your God,

yI also will forget your children. [x]


             Their problem is not ignorance but covenantal betrayal. Heiser frequently notes that Israel’s apostasy was fundamentally a failure of loyalty, not theology: “The prophets indict Israel not for misunderstanding Yahweh, but for refusing to act according to what they knew.”[xi]

Thus Hosea calls them to return: “Let us know; let us press on to know the LORD” (Hos 6:3). True knowledge is the believing loyalty that continually re-aligns the heart toward God.




In Conclusion

John Chapter 4 brings this biblical trajectory to its Messianic/Christological culmination. Jesus tells the Samaritan woman, “You worship what you do not know,” identifying a worship disconnected from covenantal revelation. True knowledge of God is tied to receiving God’s self-disclosure—now revealed in Messiah.

Heiser emphasizes that allegiance to Jesus as Messiah is the New Covenant form of believing loyalty: “The gospel is a call to believe and remain loyal to Jesus as God’s chosen king.”[xii] The woman’s transformation illustrates this dynamic—revelation received, truth embraced, and loyalty expressed through testimony and worship realigned.

Taken together, these texts and themes form a coherent biblical vision. To know God is to receive His revelation, allow it to reshape the heart, imitate His character, walk in covenant fidelity, return to Him continually, and persevere in the believing loyalty that fuses faith and obedience. Knowledge without obedience, justice, chesed, or allegiance is not biblical knowing. True knowledge of God is enacted, embodied, loyal, and renewed daily. To know Him, we must study. When we know Him, then we revere Him. Daʿat ʾelōhiym. Da ‘at Yeshua. I pray this study has drawn you nearer to Him. Shalom.


There are a few more things we need to discuss. I have made much of our own obligations to study the Word of God; how though, did we receive this Word? The following is but a taste of our next series: “The Supernatural Transmission of the Word of God: Why it Matters.”

I pray you will join me. You will see this again…


APPENDIX

“THE DIVINE–HUMAN SYNERGY OF SCRIPTURE”

A Supplement to the Supernatural Transmission Series


INTRODUCTION

In this study, we have shown that Scripture did not descend mechanically from heaven, nor is it merely a human archive of religious memory. The biblical text portrays itself as the result of a divine–human synergy: God speaking through His people, and His people faithfully speaking for God. This harmonious cooperation is neither accidental nor peripheral—it is the very means by which God chose to reveal His Word.

This appendix summarizes that synergy in biblical, theological, and historical terms, and provides foundational readings for deeper study.


SECTION 1 — THE BIBLICAL PATTERN OF SYNERGY


1.1 “Men Spoke from God”: The Pattern in 2 Peter 1:20–21

Peter gives one of the most concise statements on inspiration:

“Men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” (2 Pet 1:21)

Here we see two active subjects:

  • Humans — “men spoke”
  • God — “carried along by the Spirit”

The apostles do not erase human agency, style, vocabulary, or historical context. Nor do they present the prophets as independent religious geniuses. Instead, Scripture shows God’s breath and human voice working together in a single act of revelation. ¹

1.2 God Speaks Through Human Mouths

The New Testament repeatedly attributes biblical speech to both God and human authors:

  • “You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of David.” (Acts 4:25)
  • “As the Holy Spirit says…” (Heb 3:7)
  • God speaks “through David” (Heb 4:7)

This dual attribution reveals a consistent pattern: one word, two authors—God as the primary author, the human as the genuine, willing instrument. ²

1.3 Human Processes in Inspired Scripture

The Bible does not hide its human elements:

  • Luke’s research (Luke 1:1–4)
  • Scribal copying in Proverbs (Prov 25:1)
  • Jeremiah’s scroll rewritten and expanded (Jer 36)

These passages show that inspiration is not divine override; it is divine superintendence, working through the natural processes of writing, editing, preserving, and proclaiming. ³


SECTION 2 — REJECTING THE FALSE ALTERNATIVES


2.1 The Dictation Model

Some imagine that if Scripture is God’s Word, the authors must have exercised no freedom: no choice of words, no shaping of narrative, no poetic expression, no cultural idioms. But such a view:

  • contradicts Luke’s own description of his work,
  • ignores the individuality of the biblical authors, and
  • collapses inspiration into mechanical control.⁴

2.2 The Purely Human Model

Others view Scripture as only a human construction. But this neglects:

  • God’s repeated self-claims of speaking,
  • the prophetic office as divinely initiated,
  • and the apostolic witness as Spirit-driven and authoritative.

This view preserves human expression but at the cost of God’s voice.

2.3 Scripture’s Own Middle Way

The Bible presents neither extreme, but a cooperative model:

  • Humans truly speak.
  • God truly speaks.
  • The Spirit “carries along,” guides, and empowers without erasing humanity.

This is exactly the pattern we would expect from the God who formed Adam from dust, sent prophets and apostles, and ultimately became flesh in Messiah Yeshua.


SECTION 3 — SYNERGY AS GOD’S ORDINARY MODE OF ACTION


Scripture gives many examples of divine–human cooperation:

  • Sanctification:
    “Work out your salvation… for it is God who works in you.” (Phil 2:12–13)
  • Apostolic labor:
    “I worked harder… yet not I, but the grace of God within me.” (1 Cor 15:10)

In neither example does Paul reduce himself to a passive instrument. God’s activity empowers, rather than replaces, human activity.

The formation of Scripture is no different: human authors, scribes, collectors, and communities work, while God works through them.


SECTION 4 — CANON AS THE SPIRIT-GUIDED END OF THE PROCESS


If Scripture emerges from divine–human cooperation, then the formation of the canon is the Spirit-shaped culmination of that cooperation.

  • God guided Israel’s preservation of Torah, Prophets, and Writings.
  • God guided the apostles and their companions in producing the New Testament.
  • God guided the early communities who recognized, circulated, and protected the inspired writings. ⁵

The canon is not arbitrary. It is the result of long-term providence—God superintending the community of faith to preserve exactly what He intended to give His people.


SECTION 5 — SUMMARY DOCTRINAL STATEMENT


We affirm that Holy Scripture is the fully divine and fully human Word of God. The biblical authors wrote freely and creatively within their historical contexts, yet they were carried along by the Holy Spirit so that their words are the very speech of God. God superintended not only the initial moments of composition but the long processes of transmission, editing, collection, and canon formation. Therefore Scripture stands as the sovereignly guided and faithfully preserved witness of God to His people.


ANNOTATED READING LIST


Heiser, Michael S.

  • The Unseen Realm — foundational for understanding the supernatural worldview that frames biblical revelation.
  • Supernatural — accessible summary of divine communication in ancient contexts.

Walton, John H., and Brent Sandy.

  • The Lost World of Scripture — premier treatment of inspiration as divine–human communication embedded in ANE literary culture.

Wright, N. T.

  • The Last Word — Scripture as the Spirit-led story, culminating in the canon.

Childs, Brevard S.

  • Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture — canonical shaping and the theological role of the final form of the text.

Longman, Tremper III.

  • How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth — the genres, voices, and literary forms through which God speaks.

FOOTNOTES


  1. For a classic treatment of “dual authorship,” see John Calvin, Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles, on 2 Peter 1:21.
  2. Cf. F. F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture, who highlights the NT’s dual attribution of Psalms to both David and the Spirit.
  3. John H. Walton and Brent Sandy, The Lost World of Scripture, esp. Propositions 1–6.
  4. B. B. Warfield, The Inspiration and Authority of the Bible, provides the strongest traditional defense of verbal inspiration; however, his model often minimizes human literary freedom.
  5. On the Spirit-guided recognition of canon, see N. T. Wright, The Last Word, and Brevard Childs, Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture.

End of Appendix.


Till next time, may the Lord Richly Bless you and Keep you.

Amein



[i]NOTICE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: Unless otherwise cited, all material found on this blogsite (original text, opinions, conclusions, and other material not related to cited sources remains the collected intellectual property of the author of this site, David E. Robinson, Elder, teacher, and minister, and are owned and controlled by myself and are protected by copyright and trademark laws and various other intellectual property rights and unfair competition laws of the United States, foreign jurisdictions, and international conventions. Any errors found within, rest solely upon me; please do not blame the Father for my mistakes. I am teachable and correctable, not infallible. 😊 What I aim to do in this blog is trying to help you study your Bible better, by providing you with notes and explanations that you, my dear reader, may not have the resources available to you.

 

[ii] FAIR USE DISCLAIMER: This blog site may contain content that is not authorized for use by its owner. All such material will be cited back to its original source. According to Section 107 of the Copyright Act: “…the fair use of a copyrighted work […] for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright…” I have made and will continue to make every effort to stay within all ethical and moral guidelines in the use of material presented here, and the use of these materials is solely intended for educational purposes only, and all efforts to obtain or sustain fair use of non-owned material will be made. That being said, this site is for education only and is not affiliated with any institution, organization, or religious group. It is the sole production of its editor/author. Use of information from Jewish-themed websites (or any other source material) should not be construed as these sites endorsing or confirming any thesis introduced by the author of this epistle. I present the information from their respective sites for instructional purposes only and/or to aid in the readers understanding of the subjects discussed.

 

[iii] Author’s note:  Throughout these studies, I will be using the NET Bible® and the NET Notes®: within the notes you will see symbols like this: ( B Ψ 892* 2427 sys) [see explanation below…]. These are abbreviations used by the NET Bible® for identifying the principal manuscript evidence that they (authors and translators of the NET Bible®) used in translating the Old and New Testament. Please go to https://bible.org/netbible/  and see their section labeled “NET Bible Principals of Translation” for a more complete explanation on these symbols and other items pertinent to the way the NET Bible uses them. Net® foot/end notes will be separated as follows:

 

(start of): NET Bible® Notes: {the numbered notations are unique to the NET® Bible and will be separated by this notation.}

(end of): {End Net® Notes}

 

This is not to say that the NET® Bible will be our only source of God’s word but will be used as seen fit.  To help you understand, the symbols listed here mean the following:

Breakdown of the symbols

·                     B: This refers to Codex Vaticanus, one of the oldest and most important Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. Dating to the 4th century CE, it is a key witness to the Alexandrian text-type.

·                     Ψ (Psi): This is a standard abbreviation for the book of Psalms, from the Greek word psalmoi. In New Testament textual notes, it can also refer to the important 8th-century Greek manuscript Codex Athous Lavrensis.

·                     892*: This is a number assigned to a specific ancient biblical manuscript. The asterisk (*raised to the * power*) indicates that the reading came from the original, uncorrected version of the manuscript. The manuscript itself is a 9th-century Greek minuscule manuscript containing the Gospels and Acts.

·                     2427: This refers to another Greek minuscule manuscript, dating to the 14th century, containing the Gospels.

·                     sys: This is an abbreviation for the Syriac manuscript tradition, which was a very important early translation of the New Testament into Syriac, a dialect of Aramaic. 

·                     For those who wish to take their studies to the next level, a list of symbols used in textural criticism can be found here: https://www.cob-net.org/compare/docs/reference-charts-ciampa.pdf

 

Also, in these studies, I have used the notes that come along with the passages cited from the sources notated: these need a bit of a disclaimer though. As in all things, not everything that is footnoted is something that may I necessarily agree with [nor specifically disagree with]; the only instances will be where I may find it not compatible with what I believe pertains to any matters of the Torah or the commandments of God. I give you the notes as they are written by the authors of the material I cite from, so that you can see the information contained within them. It truly is not my place to edit or ignore them; if they state anything that is in opposition to what I teach, then so be it. I will address these issues if requested. That is not to say I should not challenge something I believe, in my humble opinion, might contradict the truth of God’s word; that I will do in the main body of my epistles for that is where my gentle dissent belongs.  Most (but not all) of the differences will come when a QUOTED source displays a decidedly Western/Greek mindset, as opposed to one of the Hebraic Perspectives. I must be intellectually honest – I am biased toward the God of Avraham, Issachar, and Yakob, and his son, Yeshua, the Messiah. I pray we all can find common ground as we study the Scriptures. Also, some may be put off by the length or depth of the notes; not everyone has access to the references I do, so therefore, I try to include the notes that come with the material I use, so each can see for themselves the information the originator has pointedly gleaned. I hope you avail yourselves to these inclusions – they help us to understand how the material in scripture is laid out and the thought process of the original writers of Scripture.

 p ch. 9:17; [ch. 6:14]

q Luke 7:16, 39; See Matt. 21:11

r Gen. 12:6, 7; 33:18, 20; Deut. 11:29; 27:12; Josh. 8:33

s Judg. 9:7

t See Deut. 12:5

u [ch. 11:48]

v ch. 2:4

w ver. 23; ch. 5:25, 28; 16:2, 25, 32

x Zeph. 2:11; Mal. 1:11; 1 Tim. 2:8

y [2 Kgs. 17:28–34; Acts 17:23]

z Ps. 147:19, 20; Isa. 2:3; Rom. 3:1, 2; 9:4, 5

z Ps. 147:19, 20; Isa. 2:3; Rom. 3:1, 2; 9:4, 5

a Matt. 2:4, 5; Acts 13:23; Rom. 11:26

b ver. 21

c [Rom. 8:15; Eph. 2:18; 6:18; Phil. 3:3]

d Ps. 145:18; [ch. 1:17]

e [ch. 6:44]

[iv] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Jn 4:19–24.

 [v] Michael S. Heiser, *What Does God Want?* (Lampion Press, 2019), 47–49.

 z ch. 4:1; 5:31; 12:1

1 Or just decrees; also verse 20

a ch. 5:29; 10:12, 20; 13:4; Ps. 128:1; Eccles. 12:13

b See ch. 4:40

c Gen. 15:5; 22:17; 26:4; 28:14; Ex. 32:13

d Cited Mark 12:29; [Isa. 42:8; Zech. 14:9; John 17:3; 1 Cor. 8:4, 6]

2 Or The Lord our God is one Lord; or The Lord is our God, the Lord is one; or The Lord is our God, the Lord alone

e Cited Matt. 22:37; Mark 12:30; Luke 10:27; [2 Kgs. 23:25]

f ch. 11:18; 32:46; Ps. 37:31; Isa. 51:7; Jer. 31:33

g See ch. 4:9

h ch. 11:18; Prov. 3:3; 6:21; 7:3; See Ex. 13:9

i ch. 11:20; [Isa. 57:8]

[vi] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Dt 6:1–9.

 [vii] When we “see”, when we “hear”, when we “understand and obey” the Name above all Names, then we are as Oswald Chambers said of Moses: “…Moses endured, not because he had an ideal of right and duty, but because he had a vision of God. He "endured, as seeing Him Who is invisible." A man with the vision of God is not devoted to a cause or to any particular issue: he is devoted to God Himself…”  What is your vision today? 20-20? Hindsight? Or Fore sight?

 [viii] Michael S. Heiser, *The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible* (Lexham Press, 2015), ch. 19.

[ix] 3. Michael S. Heiser, *What Does God Want?*, 36–38.

k See ch. 5:1

l Isa. 3:13, 14; Jer. 25:31; Mic. 6:2

m [ver. 6, 14; Jer. 4:22; 5:4]

n [ch. 7:1]

o [ch. 6:9; 12:14; Mic. 3:10; 7:2]

p Isa. 24:4; Jer. 4:28; Joel 1:10

q [Joel 1:18; Zeph. 1:3]

r [Ezek. 38:20]

s [ver. 17]

t [Deut. 17:12]

1 Or for your people are like those who contend with the priest

u ch. 2:2

v [ver. 1; Isa. 5:13]

w [Prov. 1:29]

x [Ex. 19:6]

y [Jer. 23:39]

[x] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Ho 4:1–6.

 [xi] Michael S. Heiser, *Supernatural: What the Bible Teaches About the Unseen World—and Why It Matters* (Lexham Press, 2015), ch. 4.

[xii] Michael S. Heiser, *The Unseen Realm*, ch. 42.